PHILIPSBURG:--- During the Council of Ministers press briefing on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, Prime Minister Dr. Luc Mercelina provided a detailed update on the ongoing discourse surrounding a court case involving a high-ranking civil servant and the government of Sint Maarten. The Prime Minister outlined the judicial timeline, defended the government’s actions, and directly addressed recent allegations linking his administration to supposed integrity breaches. He also criticized former Prime Minister Silveria Jacobs for her public commentary on the case, which he described as a threat to the integrity of Sint Maarten’s judicial system.
Timeline of the Court Case
The legal battle centers around Secretary General Hensley Plantijn, who initiated proceedings against Sint Maarten's government following a decision he contested. Prime Minister Mercelina explained that the case was first heard by the Court of First Instance, which ruled in favor of the government. Dissatisfied with the verdict, the Secretary-General appealed the decision.
“The appellate court overturned the original verdict rendered by the Court of First Instance,” the Prime Minister stated during the briefing, emphasizing the procedural nature of the case. He outlined the key timeline:
- December 23, 2023: The Court of First Instance issued its ruling.
- January 2024: The Secretary General filed for an appeal within the allotted six-week period.
- March 2024: The government submitted its counterarguments under the previous administration, before the Marcelina Cabinet taking office on May 3, 2024.
- January 2025: The hearing for the case was held. At this point, Marcelina’s administration was in office.
- May 21, 2025: The appellate court issued its verdict, overturning the initial ruling in favor of the civil servant.
Mercelina clarified that the government provided a defense during the appeals process and ensured continuity in legal representation, refuting claims of negligence or deliberate inaction.
Addressing Integrity Allegations
Prime Minister Mercelina firmly rejected allegations that his administration failed to uphold good governance or acted improperly during the appeals process. He emphasized that the Marcelina Cabinet was not involved in preparing the case documents, which had been filed prior to his tenure as Prime Minister. Additionally, when the case was active in 2025, another minister (Minister of Justice) was assigned to handle the matter due to potential conflicts of interest.
“To suggest that I or any member of my cabinet breached integrity in this matter is both false and misinformed,” Mercelina asserted. “The timeline makes it clear that my administration played no part in decisions made before we took office.”
He also pointed out that the appellate court’s decision was based on evidence presented before his administration assumed office. Despite the verdict, the Prime Minister emphasized the importance of respecting judicial outcomes as a pillar of democracy.
Criticism of Former Prime Minister Silveria Jacobs
Prime Minister Mercelina took aim at former Prime Minister Silveria Jacobs for her public comments regarding the case. Jacobs had reportedly encouraged individuals on social media to “do their research” despite the appellate court’s ruling.
“This action is an attempt to challenge the credibility of our judiciary and perpetuate a biased narrative,” said Mercelina. “It constitutes a violation of professional conduct and undermines the principle of respecting court decisions.”
He described Jacobs’ actions as “ethically questionable” and expressed concern over the precedent it might set for public trust in the legal system. Sharing sensitive legal information publicly, especially when it pertains to settled matters, violates the oath taken by civil servants and elected officials, Mercelina added.
“The integrity of our court system must not be called into question lightly. These decisions are the foundation of our rule of law, and any attempt to slander the judicial process tarnishes public trust in governance,” he warned.
The Importance of Judicial Respect and Professional Conduct
Mercelina stressed that public officials have a duty to respect the integrity of the judicial system, regardless of personal opinions or political affiliations. He highlighted three key points:
- Transparency in Governance: The government’s role in the court case followed established legal procedures, with all actions carried out transparently and in accordance with the law.
- Accountability: Elected officials’ decisions and statements must align with their ethical responsibilities to uphold public trust.
- Maintaining Stability: Public discourse aimed at undermining court rulings weakens the fabric of democracy and creates unnecessary instability.
Reaffirming Relationships with Civil Servants
Addressing rumors of conflicts between his administration and former civil servant Emilia Connor Thomas, Mercelina clarified that her departure from public service was unrelated to any disputes. He said she had previously informed him of her plans to pursue a private sector opportunity before he took office.
“The insinuations of a conflict are baseless. I wish Mrs. Connor Thomas all the best in her career, and we continue to maintain a positive relationship,” the Prime Minister said.
Looking Ahead
Prime Minister Mercelina concluded by urging all parties to act responsibly and professionally in their engagements with the legal and political systems. He called on citizens and public officials alike to prioritize the integrity of Sint Maarten’s governance and democracy.
“We must focus on solutions that unite our nation and uphold the principles that form the foundation of our society. Respect for the judiciary and a commitment to integrity will ensure that trust in our institutions remains strong,” he stated.
The case and its surrounding discourse serve as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding professional conduct and public trust. For Sint Maarten, it highlights the need for unity and transparency as the country navigates both internal challenges and external political dynamics.
