Four years after the hack, GEBE still doesn't know where some of the money went.

~ Company admits unidentified payments, disputed accounts, dead-account holders, and billing complications continue to haunt operations.~ 

irisarrindell19062026PHILIPSBURG:---  More than four years after the cyberattack that crippled NV GEBE's billing and customer management systems, the utility is still struggling to determine where some customer payments belong, exposing a web of unresolved account disputes, landlord conflicts, incomplete customer records and administrative challenges that continue to affect thousands of customers.

During Friday's press conference, Temporary Manager Iris Arrindell revealed that despite years of reconstruction efforts following the March 17, 2022, cyberattack, GEBE continues to receive payments that cannot be matched to customer accounts.

"To date, we still have monies that we have received, and we do not know where to apply some of those funds," Arrindell admitted.

The statement was one of the most striking revelations during Friday's briefing and offers a glimpse into the lingering impact of the cyberattack that erased critical customer and billing data from the utility's systems.

March 17, 2022: The Day Everything Changed

According to the presentation slides shown during the press conference, GEBE's systems were compromised on March 17, 2022. Management quickly discovered that not only had the company's systems been breached, but internal backups had also been compromised.

The presentation states that only certain information stored on desktop computers survived the attack.

Two days later, management assessed what remained.

The results were alarming.

The only available digital backup dates back to March 2021. The utility's customer open balances as of February 2022 survived only because they had been downloaded to a desktop computer on March 9, 2022. The company also had access to paper meter reading schedules, meter readings, bank statements, and manually generated work orders.

Faced with the possibility of having to rebuild an entire year of operational history, management rejected suggestions to create estimated bills in Excel and instead hired SAP consultants to reconstruct the company's database using both digital and paper records.

Customers were instructed to continue paying their normal bills while reconstruction efforts were underway.

Rebuilding a year of lost history

Consultants hired by GEBE concluded that information created between March 2021 and March 17, 2022, had effectively been lost.

The company was forced to reconstruct customer accounts using open items, historical records, and manually created orders before uploading the information back into SAP.

As part of the recovery process, GEBE created what became known as "bridge bills" to maintain continuity between the old and reconstructed systems.

However, the process did not go smoothly.

Management disclosed that January meter readings were mistakenly used in place of February readings during part of the reconstruction effort, necessitating corrections to March 2022 bills across the customer base. Additionally, bridge bills that were never intended for customer distribution were inadvertently sent out, creating confusion and public concern.

The utility spent months correcting records and rebuilding customer histories.

The Account Number Problem

One of the most persistent issues facing GEBE today involves customer payments that cannot be matched to specific accounts.

According to Arrindell, many customers paid their bills through the banking system without including their contract account numbers.

As a result, funds were received by GEBE but could not always be linked to the correct customer account.

The utility repeatedly asked customers to visit its offices with proof of payment so transactions could be verified and applied correctly.

Years later, some of those payments remain unresolved.

"We do not know where to apply some of those funds," Arrindell said.

The result is that money may have been paid, but the utility cannot always determine which customer should receive credit.

Landlords, Tenants, and Unpaid Bills

Presentation slides also revealed one of the utility's most frustrating challenges: rental properties.

According to GEBE, many landlords keep utility accounts in their own names while collecting utility payments from tenants as part of rental agreements. Problems arise when those funds are not forwarded to GEBE.

When disconnections occur, tenants often insist they have already paid.

"The tenant says, 'I paid the landlord,'" Arrindell explained during the press conference.

However, from GEBE's perspective, the account holder remains legally responsible for the debt.

The utility says these situations continue to create disputes and complicate collection efforts.

Dead Account Holders, Live Services.

The utility also disclosed that inheritance issues remain a major obstacle to maintaining accurate customer records.

According to GEBE's presentation, many accounts remain registered in the names of deceased persons because families never formally transfer ownership after a death.

Management explained that utility accounts often become entangled in inheritance disputes involving multiple heirs.

As a result, electricity and water services continue to be supplied under the names of people who are no longer alive.

GEBE says it often has no way of knowing an account holder has died unless family members voluntarily come forward.

People Move, Accounts Stay Behind

Another issue highlighted by management is the high level of residential movement on St. Maarten.

According to Arrindell, approximately 200 people move to and from the island each month.

Customers frequently move out without notifying GEBE, while new occupants move into properties and begin using utilities connected to accounts that remain in someone else's name.

When collections begin or disconnections occur, the utility often finds itself trying to determine who actually incurred the debt.

The problem became even more difficult after the cyberattack forced the company to reconstruct years of customer movement records.

More than half of customers are still out of Reach

One of the more surprising disclosures from the presentation was that more than half of GEBE's customers have still not provided updated contact information.

The utility has repeatedly asked customers to submit email addresses and telephone numbers so notices, reminders, and billing information can be delivered electronically.

According to management, the lack of updated contact information continues to hinder communication efforts and contributes to disputes over billing and collections.

How GEBE changed its Policies

The presentation also showed how the utility altered its collection and customer assistance policies in response to the crisis.

Initially, GEBE focused disconnections primarily on businesses while attempting to sort out customer account issues.

The company also made a significant concession to customers by absorbing the cost of all water leaks prior to December 2024. Management said delayed billing during 2023 and 2024 prevented many customers from identifying excessive water usage in time to correct problems.

Payment plans were expanded beyond water-leak cases and offered to customers struggling with balances from the post-hack period.

However, management found that many customers paid only the payment plan amount while allowing current bills to continue accumulating. The company has since revised its approach and now requires customers to make payments that address both outstanding balances and current consumption.

Customers unable to cover even their current monthly bills are referred to Social Services for possible assistance.

According to Arrindell, that collaboration eventually evolved into a formal support program between GEBE and Social Services.

The Hidden Side of the Collection Crisis

The billing complications help explain why GEBE continues to struggle with collections.

Management disclosed that only 58.6 percent of customers paid their bills in May 2026, while more than 9,500 customers remain delinquent.

Public attention has largely focused on disconnections, rising utility costs, and fuel clauses.

But Friday's presentation revealed another reality: collecting money is only part of the problem.

Identifying who owes what, who has already paid, and where certain payments belong remains an ongoing challenge.

GEBE'S own analogy tells the story

Perhaps the most revealing slide presented by Arrindell compared GEBE to an employee earning XCG 26,386 per month but receiving only 58.6 percent of that salary because customers are not paying.

According to the presentation, the utility effectively receives XCG 15,462 while still incurring obligations totaling XCG 14,199 for fuel and water purchases, XCG 4,000 for operating expenses, and XCG 750 for general expenses. The resulting shortfall must be covered through cash flow reserves.

The message was clear: GEBE is not simply dealing with a collections problem. It is still grappling with the consequences of a cyberattack that fundamentally disrupted customer records, payment histories, and account management.

Four years after March 17, 2022, the systems may be back online, but the utility's own presentation makes clear that the effects of the hack continue to ripple through every aspect of its operations.

And perhaps the most troubling revelation of all is that some of the money is still sitting in GEBE's accounts with no one knowing exactly where it belongs.


Three Arrested Following Firearms Discovery at Oyster Pond Hotel.

firearms22062026PHILIPSBURG:--- On Saturday afternoon, June 20, 2026, the Police Force of Sint Maarten (KPSM) received credible information indicating that several individuals residing at a hotel in the Oyster Pond area were unlawfully in possession of firearms. Acting swiftly on this intelligence, the KPSM immediately deployed a combined unit of detectives and patrol officers to the location.

Upon arrival, officers conducted a control at the premises. During the operation, three individuals were encountered and two firearms were discovered and secured and confiscated. All three suspects were subsequently arrested and transported to the KPSM station in Philipsburg, where they are currently being held and questioned in connection with the incident.

The KPSM continues to call upon the community of Sint Maarten to remain vigilant and to report any information regarding the illegal possession of firearms or narcotics on the island. Community partnership and active participation in crime prevention are essential to maintaining the safety and security of all residents and visitors – on both the Dutch and French sides of the island.

“See Something – Say Something”

Police Force of Sint Maarten Conducts Vehicle and Documentation Controls on A.J.C. Brouwers Road.

controlskpsm22062026PHILIPSBURG:--- In response to a recent increase in serious scooter and vehicle accidents, as well as firearm-related incidents on both sides of the island, the Police Force of Sint Maarten (KPSM) conducted a traffic control over the weekend of June 20, 2026, on the A.J.C. Brouwers Road.

During the control, a total of 26 vehicles were stopped and checked, along with 2 scooters/motorcycles, which were inspected on both documentation and technical compliance. As a result of the control, 3 fines were issued for various infractions observed during the checks.

The Police Force of Sint Maarten emphasizes that these actions are part of a broader, ongoing effort to improve road safety and reduce crime across the island. In the coming days and weeks, officers will continue to conduct preventative searches and vehicle controls in accordance with the firearms and narcotics legislation in force on Sint Maarten.

The Police Force of Sint Maarten calls on the general public to cooperate during these operations, which are carried out in the interest of the safety and well-being of the entire community.

Annual Accounts Backlog Raises Serious Concerns Ahead of 2026 Budget Debate.

annualaccounts22062026PHILIPSBURG:--- As Parliament prepares to handle the 2026 budget, possibly starting June 26, another serious issue is emerging from the budget documents and the Council of Advice's advice: St. Maarten is once again preparing and debating a national budget without the most recently approved annual accounts.

This is not a minor administrative delay. Annual accounts, also referred to as financial statements, are documents that show what the government actually collected and spent, where the money went, and whether the budget approved by Parliament was respected. Without timely approved annual accounts, Parliament’s oversight becomes weaker, less current, and less effective.

The Council of Advice pointed out that the annual accounts for 2022, 2023, and 2024 have still not been adopted. The Council also reminded the government that these annual accounts should be prepared before September 1 of the year following the financial year in question. These accounts must give a lawful and reliable picture of the government’s financial policy and financial management.

In plain language, this means Parliament is being asked to judge the 2026 budget without having the finalized financial picture for the last three completed financial years. That is a major concern.

A national budget is not just a list of future plans. It should be based on reliable realization figures from previous years. If the most recent annual accounts are not approved, Members of Parliament are forced to rely on incomplete, provisional, or outdated figures. That limits their ability to determine whether the government’s revenue projections are realistic, whether expenditures are being controlled, and whether previous budget promises were actually carried out.

This directly weakens Parliament’s budget right. Parliament approves the budget, but It must also be able to verify afterward whether the government adhered to it. When annual accounts are delayed, Parliament's control function is pushed years behind the reality.

The situation is even more concerning because St. Maarten had made visible progress in addressing the backlog of annual accounts in recent years. The previous government met a serious backlog, with annual accounts still outstanding from several years before. Between 2020 and 2023, seven annual accounts were completed and accepted, covering the financial years 2015 through 2021.

Those were:

- 2015 annual accounts, accepted October 26, 2020;

- 2016 annual accounts, accepted March 29, 2021;

- 2017 annual accounts, accepted December 3, 2021;

- 2018 annual accounts, accepted December 3, 2021;

- 2019 annual accounts, accepted October 12, 2022;

- 2020 annual accounts, accepted October 12, 2022;

- 2021 annual accounts, accepted September 15, 2023.

That means seven years of annual accounts were dealt with during that period, significantly reducing the backlog the government had inherited. However, based on the Council of Advice’s comments, the country is now falling behind again, with the 2022, 2023, and 2024 annual accounts still not adopted.

This raises an important question: why was momentum lost?

For Parliament, this is not simply about bookkeeping. Annual accounts are one of the most important tools for holding ministers accountable. They show whether ministers managed public money properly. They also help determine whether Parliament can formally discharge ministers for the financial management carried out during a given year.

If these documents are late, Parliament cannot properly close the financial year. It cannot properly compare budgeted amounts with actual spending. It cannot fully assess whether money was used for the purposes approved by Parliament. And it cannot properly judge whether the new budget is based on reality or on assumptions.

This matters even more in the context of the 2026 budget. The budget contains major increases in certain areas, questions about project funds, subsidies, and contributions, and concerns already raised by the Council of Advice regarding budget coverage for certain expenditures. Without recently approved annual accounts, Parliament’s ability to test those figures becomes even more limited.

The Council of Advice’s concern should therefore not be dismissed as a technical observation. It goes to the heart of financial accountability.

A country cannot claim strong public finance management while its annual accounts remain years behind. Budgets look forward, but annual accounts tell the truth about what happened. Without that truth, Parliament is debating with one eye covered.

The government will have to explain when the 2022, 2023, and 2024 annual accounts will be submitted, when they will be audited, when Parliament can handle them, and why the progress made in clearing the backlog has not continued.

As the 2026 budget debate approaches, the central question is clear: how can Parliament responsibly approve future spending when the country has not yet properly closed and approved the financial statements for the last three years?

Freemasonry Deemed Incompatible with Judicial Ethics in Landmark French Opinion.

gavel05032026A recent opinion issued by France’s Judicial Ethics College has reignited debate over the relationship between Freemasonry and the judiciary, concluding that membership in a Masonic lodge may be incompatible with the ethical obligations expected of judges and magistrates.

The opinion, delivered on June 9, 2026, was requested by a magistrate who had been invited to join a Masonic organization and sought guidance on whether such membership would conflict with the professional duties attached to judicial office. After examining the issue, the Ethics College determined that the principles governing judicial independence and impartiality could be compromised by affiliations involving obligations of loyalty, solidarity, or confidentiality toward fellow members.

According to the College, magistrates are required to maintain complete independence from any external influence, whether political, social, religious, or philosophical. While individuals are generally free to associate with organizations of their choosing, judges occupy a unique position in society that demands the highest standards of neutrality and objectivity.

The opinion emphasized that certain characteristics commonly associated with Masonic organizations—particularly mutual assistance among members, internal loyalty, and confidential proceedings—may create a risk of conflict with judicial responsibilities. Even where no actual conflict exists, the perception of divided loyalties could undermine public confidence in the justice system.

Judicial ethics increasingly focuses not only on preventing real bias but also on avoiding situations that might reasonably give rise to doubts about a judge’s independence. The Ethics College stressed that maintaining public trust is a fundamental component of the rule of law. Citizens must be able to believe that judicial decisions are based solely on legal principles and the facts of each case.

The ruling does not establish a blanket legal prohibition on Freemasonry for all magistrates. Rather, it serves as a deontological assessment intended to guide judges and prosecutors in evaluating whether their affiliations are compatible with the obligations of their office. Nevertheless, the conclusion represents one of the strongest statements yet issued by a French judicial ethics body on the subject.

The decision has already sparked discussion among legal professionals, academics, and members of Masonic organizations. Supporters argue that judges must avoid any form of allegiance that could interfere with their duty to remain impartial. Critics, however, contend that membership in a philosophical or fraternal association does not automatically compromise professional integrity and that freedom of association should remain protected.

The controversy touches upon a broader question facing modern judicial systems: how to balance personal freedoms with the heightened ethical standards required of those entrusted with administering justice. As courts continue to face growing public scrutiny, issues of transparency, accountability, and perceived independence are likely to remain at the center of legal and political debate.

Whether the opinion ultimately leads to changes in judicial guidance or professional practice remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the ruling has reopened a longstanding discussion about the limits of private affiliations for public officials and the importance of preserving confidence in the impartiality of the courts.

 

Click here for the link

More Articles ...


Subcategories