After 377 years, St. Maarten's border is finally being written into history.

~France completes parliamentary approval of historic border treaty; Dutch Kingdom still awaits final ratification.~

 

frenchdutchborder16072026PHILIPSBURG/MARIGOT:--- Nearly four centuries after French and Dutch settlers agreed to divide the island of St. Martin, one of the oldest unresolved international boundaries in the Caribbean is on the verge of finally being settled.

On Thursday, July 16, 2026, the French National Assembly adopted the bill authorizing the Agreement between the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands establishing the international boundary between Saint-Martin and Sint Maarten to be approved. The vote marks the completion of France's parliamentary approval process for a treaty that finally defines, in legal and geographical terms, where French territory ends and Dutch territory begins.

The agreement, however, is not yet in force. Before it can take legal effect, the Kingdom of the Netherlands must complete its own parliamentary approval process through Kingdom Bill 36956 (R2220), which is still before the Dutch Parliament.

When that process is completed and both governments exchange diplomatic notifications confirming that their constitutional procedures have been fulfilled, history will be made.

For the first time since 1648, the entire border separating the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands on the island will have a legally recognized and internationally ratified definition.

A Border Created in 1648—But Never Completely Defined

The story begins almost 378 years ago.

On March 23, 1648, representatives of France and the Dutch Republic signed what became known as the Treaty of Concordia.

The agreement divided the island between the two colonial powers after Spain abandoned its occupation.

The treaty established that both nations would peacefully coexist and that residents would enjoy freedom of movement between both territories.

But while the treaty determined which portions of the island belonged to each nation, it never established an exact border using modern surveying methods or geographical coordinates.

Instead, the border relied largely on natural landmarks, historical descriptions and mutual understanding.

For centuries, this informal arrangement functioned reasonably well.

People lived, worked, traded and crossed freely between both sides.

However, governments increasingly encountered legal uncertainty whenever questions arose involving:

  • land ownership,
  • coastal development,
  • Oyster Pond,
  • maritime jurisdiction,
  • environmental protection,
  • policing,
  • infrastructure,
  • disaster response,
  • public utilities,
  • and future investment projects.

The absence of an internationally defined boundary became more problematic as the island developed and technology made precise surveying possible.

Decades of Negotiations

According to the French parliamentary reports, discussions on formally defining the border have taken place for decades.

Experts from both governments conducted surveys, exchanged technical information and negotiated solutions to historically disputed sections.

The most difficult issues involved Oyster Pond (Étang aux Huîtres) and adjoining coastal waters.

Unlike inland areas where the border was generally accepted, Oyster Pond presented legal uncertainty over exactly where French jurisdiction ended and Dutch jurisdiction began.

The uncertainty affected navigation, environmental management, policing, permitting, development and emergency response.

Negotiations continued for more than twenty years before both governments finally reached agreement.

The Historic Signing

On May 26, 2023, representatives of both countries gathered at Belle Plaine/Belvédère to sign the treaty.

Representing the Kingdom of the Netherlands was then Prime Minister of Sint Maarten Silveria Jacobs.

Representing France was then Minister of the Interior and Overseas Territories Gérald Darmanin.

Although signed in 2023, the treaty could not become law immediately.

Under both French and Dutch constitutional systems, international treaties affecting national territory require parliamentary approval before they can enter into force.

France Moves First

France formally began the ratification process on February 25, 2026, when the government submitted Bill No. 437 to the French Senate.

On that same day, the French Government invoked the accelerated legislative procedure, recognizing the importance of the treaty.

The Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defense and Armed Forces examined the legislation and issued its report on April 8, 2026.

One week later, on April 15, the French Senate adopted the bill.

The legislation was immediately forwarded to the National Assembly on April 16, where it became Bill No. 2688.

The National Assembly's Foreign Affairs Committee studied the treaty in detail before filing Report No. 2996 on July 1.

Finally, on Thursday, July 16, 2026, the National Assembly approved the legislation without amendment under France's simplified examination procedure.

The adopted legislation became Text Adopted No. 333.

France had completed its parliamentary responsibility.

The Dutch Kingdom Still has Work to Do

Unlike France, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has not yet finalized its approval.

The Dutch Government introduced Kingdom Bill 36956 (R2220) on May 28, 2026.

The legislation is considered a Kingdom Act because the treaty concerns one of the autonomous countries within the Kingdom—Sint Maarten.

Although foreign affairs remain a Kingdom responsibility, territorial agreements affecting Sint Maarten require approval through the Kingdom legislative process.

The bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs on June 3.

Committee members submitted written questions on June 24.

As of July 16, however, parliamentary debate and voting had not yet taken place.

Only after the Dutch Parliament completes its work can the Kingdom proceed toward ratification.

Why Oyster Pond Mattered So Much

One of the principal reasons for negotiating the treaty was Oyster Pond.

For generations, there were differing interpretations regarding where the international border passed through the lagoon.

This uncertainty affected numerous governmental responsibilities.

Questions arose over which government had authority to:

  • issue permits,
  • regulate marinas,
  • investigate environmental violations,
  • remove wrecks,
  • enforce laws,
  • supervise construction,
  • undertake dredging,
  • respond to emergencies.

Following Hurricane Irma in 2017, those questions became increasingly urgent.

Massive destruction required reconstruction on both sides of the island.

Government agencies needed legal certainty regarding jurisdiction before undertaking certain recovery projects.

The treaty finally establishes that certainty through precise coordinates contained in its annexes.

Not Just a Line on a Map

The treaty is far more than a simple border agreement.

It provides a comprehensive legal framework for managing the international boundary.

Among other matters, it addresses:

  • the precise land boundary,
  • maritime delimitation,
  • internal waters,
  • coastal waters,
  • official maps,
  • technical coordinates,
  • maintenance of boundary markers,
  • cooperation between authorities,
  • future surveys,
  • procedures if markers are damaged,
  • legal certainty for public administration.

Instead of relying upon historical descriptions dating back centuries, both governments will now use modern geodetic coordinates.

What Does Not Change

Despite dramatic headlines suggesting that France and the Netherlands are "getting a new border," residents should not expect dramatic changes in daily life.

There will be:

  • no wall,
  • no fence,
  • no customs barrier,
  • no passport checkpoints,
  • no interruption of free movement.

The island's open character remains unchanged.

Residents will continue crossing between both sides just as they have for generations.

The treaty determines legal jurisdiction—not the movement of people.

What Does Change

The agreement significantly strengthens legal certainty.

Government departments will know exactly where their authority begins and ends.

This affects:

  • police investigations,
  • judicial cooperation,
  • environmental enforcement,
  • land registration,
  • infrastructure projects,
  • marina regulation,
  • coastal development,
  • disaster response,
  • public works,
  • future investments.

Developers, engineers and surveyors will now work from officially recognized international coordinates instead of historical interpretations.

Why This is Important for St. Maarten

For Sint Maarten, the treaty represents more than an international formality.

It provides certainty for future generations.

Government decisions concerning Oyster Pond, coastal development, maritime management and environmental protection will rest upon internationally recognized boundaries.

Cross-border cooperation between French and Dutch authorities will also become easier because jurisdictional questions will be substantially reduced.

The agreement provides both governments with a common legal framework for resolving future issues rather than relying upon historical custom.

A Treaty Built for the Future

The agreement also establishes mechanisms for maintaining the boundary over time.

Modern surveying techniques make it possible to accurately relocate boundary points should markers disappear or be damaged.

Technical annexes accompany the treaty containing official maps and geographic coordinates.

Those annexes become part of the international agreement itself.

Still One Final Step

Although France has completed parliamentary approval, the treaty is not yet operational.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands must still complete its legislative process.

After parliamentary approval in both countries, the governments must exchange diplomatic notifications confirming that each has fulfilled its constitutional requirements.

Only then will the agreement formally enter into force.

The End of A 377-Year Legal Uncertainty

For nearly four centuries, the island has lived with an internationally recognized political division that was never completely defined in legal or geographical terms.

Generations accepted the border largely because tradition and cooperation prevailed.

But modern governance requires precision.

Today, satellite surveying, international law, environmental management, disaster planning and coastal development demand exact boundaries—not historical approximations.

The treaty approved by France this week represents the culmination of years of negotiations, technical surveys and diplomatic cooperation between two neighboring governments that share one of the most unique islands in the world.

Once the Dutch Kingdom completes its own parliamentary approval, the border first envisioned under the Treaty of Concordia in 1648 will finally become a fully defined international frontier.

It is a historic milestone not because it changes how the people of the island live, but because it brings legal certainty to one of the Caribbean's oldest shared frontiers.

For St. Maarten and Saint-Martin, it closes a chapter that remained unfinished for 377 years and opens a new era in which the island's shared history is matched by a clearly defined international boundary recognized by both nations.


Costs and practical barriers in school sick leave call for policy reform.

schoolsickleave16072026ORANJESTAD, ARUBA:--- The Ombudsman, Ms. Jurima Bryson, LL.M., also acting in her capacity as Children's Ombudsman, published the report "The Cost of Being sick" on July 13th, 2026. The report presents the findings of an own-initiative investigation into the sick leave policy within the Aruban education system. The investigation focused on the requirement that students submit a medical certificate, whether paid or unpaid, when they are unable to attend school due to illness, including during tests and examinations.

Why was this investigation conducted?
The Ombudsman initiated this investigation following signals received from parents, students, teachers, and other stakeholders indicating that students are often required to submit a medical certificate, particularly to reschedule a test or exam after being absent due to sickness. The Ombudsman also received indications that the absence of a medical certificate may affect a student's educational position.

In her role as Children's Ombudsman, special attention was paid during the investigation to the best interests of the child, the right to education, equal treatment, and the protection of privacy.
What are the findings of the investigation?
The investigation concluded that schools view policies as a means to prevent unauthorized absenteeism, ensure that reports of sickness can be verified, and promote equal treatment among students.

At the same time, the investigation found that the costs and practical requirements of obtaining a medical certificate pose a barrier for some students and their families.

The investigation also concluded that these policies vary from one school to another. As a result, there is not always sufficient clarity regarding the applicable rules, the individualized alternatives, and the consequences of failing to provide a medical certificate.

Why is this important?
Clear and carefully designed sick leave policies are important for preventing misuse and safeguarding the continuity of education. At the same time, students who are genuinely sick should not be unfairly disadvantaged.

The Ombudsman emphasizes that any measure affecting children must always consider the best interests and rights of the child, access to education, equal opportunities, proportionality, and the protection of privacy.

What does the Ombudsman recommend?
The Ombudsman makes several recommendations to the Minister of Education, the relevant educational institutions, and other responsible parties. Among other things, it is recommended to introduce clearer, more uniform sick leave policies, improve communication with students and parents about applicable rules, provide room for alternatives and individualized policies, reduce financial barriers, and strengthen protections for medical data.

The report represents a first step toward contributing to a better balance between preventing unauthorized absenteeism and protecting students who are genuinely sick.

Next steps
The Ombudsman will monitor the educational institutions’ progress in addressing these recommendations. The Ombudsman will also stay in contact with the Minister of Education, the relevant institutions and other stakeholders.

The full report “The Cost of Being sick” is available on the Ombudsman's website, www.ombudsman.aw/en/publications/.

Stay informed about the latest developments
The Office of the Ombudsman Aruba keeps the community informed through its following communication channels:
- Facebook: Ombudsman Aruba
- Instagram: ombudsmanaruba
- LinkedIn: Ombudsman Aruba

Bonaire's only commercial Aloe Plantation faces closure as land dispute sparks outrage.

bonairealoe16072026KRALENDIJK, Bonaire — Bonaire's only commercial aloe vera plantation could soon disappear after the Public Entity Bonaire (OLB) moved to terminate the lease on agricultural land that has been home to the island's only commercial aloe operation for more than two decades, raising concerns about heritage preservation, agricultural policy, and the future of local production.

The plantation, operated by Onima Aloe N.V., has been cultivating aloe vera since 2002 and is home to approximately 15,000 aloe vera plants. The company says the OLB intends to reclaim the agricultural parcel despite the land itself being officially designated for agricultural use, with plans to allocate it to a non-agricultural function involving the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee (KMar).

Owner Jaap Ensing argues that the decision threatens not only his business but also an important part of Bonaire's cultural and economic heritage.

A Crop Rooted in Bonaire's History

Aloe cultivation has been part of Bonaire's identity since the 19th century, serving as an important contributor to the island's economy for generations. The traditional knowledge of harvesting aloe, extracting its gel, and producing aloe-based products remains a living craft, carried on today through Onima Aloe's operations.

The company produces its aloe products entirely on Bonaire, supplying local retailers, tourism businesses, wellness providers, small entrepreneurs, and long-time residents. According to Ensing, the complete production chain—from cultivation and harvesting to processing, manufacturing, and sales—takes place locally, creating jobs while supporting economic diversification and sustainable production.

Owner Rejects Claims of "Inactivity"

The dispute centers on the OLB's allegations that the agricultural parcel has been inactive.

Ensing strongly disputes that characterization, explaining that aloe vera is a drought-resistant, climate-adapted crop that naturally undergoes extended dormant periods during which little visible activity occurs.

He says the plants require minimal water and, once irrigated, quickly become ready for harvesting. Processing is then carried out at the company's laboratory located on Kaya Pos di Amor.

According to Ensing, what authorities describe as inactivity is simply a normal characteristic of aloe cultivation and should not be mistaken for neglect.

No Consultation, Says Entrepreneur

Ensing says he was caught completely off guard by the government's actions.

According to him, he received no prior warning, consultation, or opportunity to present his case before being served by a bailiff and finding the property closed off. He further claims there has been no discussion of alternative solutions or compensation for the investments made in the plantation, the anticipated production losses, or the costs of relocating the business.

Questions Over Government Policy

The proposed termination has prompted broader questions about the consistency of Bonaire's agricultural and sustainability policies.

Critics argue that replacing an active agricultural enterprise on land specifically designated for farming with a non-agricultural use appears to contradict government objectives promoting local food and product production, climate-resilient agriculture, economic self-sufficiency, and the preservation of Bonaire's cultural heritage.

Ensing has formally requested that the OLB reconsider its decision and conduct what he describes as a fair balancing of interests, taking into account not only the plantation's economic contribution but also its historical and cultural significance to Bonaire.

If the lease is ultimately terminated, the island risks losing its only commercial aloe plantation—ending a tradition woven into Bonaire's agricultural history for well over a century.

Armed Robbers target Cole Bay Supermarket, Escape toward French Side.

armedrobberyfillin13082012PHILIPSBURG:---  Detectives of the Police Force of St. Maarten (KPSM) have launched an investigation into yet another armed robbery after two masked gunmen held up a supermarket on Union Road in Cole Bay on Wednesday night before fleeing toward the French side of the island.

The robbery occurred at approximately 8:45 p.m. on Wednesday, July 15, when the two armed suspects entered the supermarket and confronted the cashier. According to preliminary police information, the suspects threatened the cashier with a firearm before making off with an undisclosed amount of cash.

After committing the robbery, the suspects quickly fled the scene on a scooter parked nearby. Police said the pair was last seen riding in the direction of the French border, once again highlighting the challenge law enforcement faces when criminals use the open border to facilitate their escape.

KPSM patrol officers, detectives, and members of the Forensic Department responded shortly after the alarm was raised. Investigators processed the crime scene, gathered forensic evidence, and began interviewing witnesses as part of the ongoing investigation.

Police have not yet released descriptions of the suspects or disclosed the amount of cash stolen.

The latest incident adds to the continuing concern over armed robberies involving scooters, a recurring pattern in several recent crimes. The use of scooters has made it easier for suspects to move quickly through traffic and cross into the French side before officers can intercept them.

Investigators are now urging anyone who was in the vicinity of Union Road around 8:45 p.m. Wednesday evening to come forward if they observed suspicious persons or vehicles or possess surveillance footage that could assist the investigation.

KPSM is asking anyone with information to contact the Police Force of St. Maarten at +1 (721) 542-2222 or provide anonymous tips through the 9300 Tip Line.

Police stressed that even seemingly minor details could prove crucial in identifying the suspects and bringing those responsible before the courts.

No Records, No Numbers: Prosecutor's Office Unable to Say How Many Suspects Walked Free Because of Prison Crisis.

~Justice System Faces New Scrutiny as OM Admits It Does Not Track Releases Linked to Detention Shortages.  Lack of prison space continues to reshape the justice system, but no one can quantify the impact.~

 

nodataprosecutorsoffice15072026PHILIPSBURG — The Prosecutor's Office has acknowledged that it does not maintain records of how many criminal suspects have been released from pre-trial detention due to the ongoing detention capacity crisis at the Pointe Blanche prison, raising fresh questions about transparency and the true impact of the country's correctional system on public safety.

The revelation came in response to questions about the number of suspects released due to overcrowding and the number of custodial sentences executed.

In a written response, the Prosecutor's Office explained that its case registration system is designed solely to record information necessary for criminal investigations and prosecutions.

"Information that is not required for the investigation or prosecution of a case is not recorded," the Prosecutor's Office stated.

As a result, officials say they cannot provide statistics on the number of suspects released because the prison lacked available detention space, since the reason for release is simply not captured in their registration system.

The admission is significant because over the past several months the Prosecutor's Office has repeatedly confirmed that suspects have been released due to the severe shortage of detention space at the Pointe Blanche House of Detention.

The issue gained renewed public attention following the release of Dr. Danny Dennaoui, whose pre-trial detention was suspended after prosecutors cited the lack of available prison space. Earlier, the undocumented Jamaican national accused of causing the fatal crash that claimed the life of scooter rider Ryan Gumbs was transferred to Immigration and deported after being released from pre-trial detention, with his criminal case still pending before the courts.

Those cases have led to broader questions that the public is now asking.

Exactly how many armed robbery suspects have been released from pre-trial detention before their court dates because there was no prison space? How many of those suspects have since been convicted, yet remain outside prison because there is still no room to execute their custodial sentences?

How many suspects involved in jewelry store robberies have been released and subsequently deported before standing trial?

Have suspects charged with rape or child molestation ever been released from pre-trial detention because of the detention crisis? If so, how many?

And how many convicted offenders are currently waiting outside prison for a cell to become available so they can begin serving sentences already imposed by the Court?

At present, the Prosecutor's Office says it cannot answer those questions because that information is simply not recorded in its case registration system.

Immigration transfers also not Recorded

The Prosecutor's Office also confirmed that when detainees are released because of limited prison capacity, prosecutors may first serve the indictment before transferring the suspect to Immigration and Border Protection if there are indications the individual may not have lawful residency status.

However, officials acknowledged they also do not record the immigration status of suspects within their case registration system.

Consequently, authorities cannot provide statistics showing how many released suspects were subsequently transferred to Immigration or removed from St. Maarten.

No figure for outstanding prison sentences

The lack of available data extends beyond pre-trial releases.

The Prosecutor's Office further disclosed that it cannot provide an exact number of custodial sentences that remain unexecuted because of the prison crisis.

Officials acknowledged that delays in executing prison sentences existed even before Hurricane Irma in 2017 but have become dramatically worse after the storm destroyed approximately 40 percent of Pointe Blanche Prison's detention capacity.

According to the Prosecutor's Office, outstanding prison sentences currently range from several weeks to several years, illustrating the growing backlog facing the country's justice system.

Growing Transparency Questions

The Prosecutor's Office emphasized that its registration system was never designed to track administrative decisions unrelated to criminal prosecution.

Nevertheless, the disclosure is likely to intensify debate over accountability within the justice system.

Without records identifying how many suspects have been released due to prison overcrowding—or how many convicted offenders remain free while awaiting imprisonment—it becomes increasingly difficult for policymakers, Parliament and the public to measure the full impact of St. Maarten's long-running detention crisis.

The inability to answer these questions also makes it impossible for the public to fully understand how many serious offenders may have benefited from the lack of detention capacity, or the extent to which the prison crisis has affected prosecutions, sentencing, immigration decisions, and the execution of court-ordered prison terms.

The issue comes as construction has finally begun on the new Point Blanche Prison, a project Government says is essential to restoring detention capacity and strengthening the administration of justice.

Until that facility becomes operational, however, the questions remain.

How many suspects have been released because there was no room? How many convicted criminals are still waiting to serve their sentences? And how many serious offenders have remained at liberty because St. Maarten simply does not have enough prison space?

The Prosecutor's Office maintains that its current registration system fulfills its legal purpose of supporting criminal investigations and prosecutions but acknowledges that it does not collect statistical data on releases related to detention capacity or on immigration actions taken following those releases.


Subcategories