Curaçao Tax Receiver Condemns SOAB Report Leak, Defends Office against Misleading Allegations.

~Receiver says leaked audit violated confidentiality and misrepresented Curaçao’s tax authority.~

WILLEMSTAD:-- The Receiver of Curaçao (Ontvanger di Kòrsou) has issued a firm public statement rejecting claims and allegations circulating in the media based on a leaked report by the Government Accountants Bureau (SOAB). The Receiver described the leak as a “serious breach of confidentiality” that unfairly tarnishes the reputation of the Curaçao Tax Service and the country as a whole.

“It is extremely easy to attack someone who cannot fully defend themselves due to legal confidentiality,” the Receiver said. “The saddest part is that not only the Tax Department but also Curaçao itself is dragged through the mud with all the consequences that follow.”

Leak Names Private Taxpayer

The controversy erupted after parts of an SOAB audit were published in local media, allegedly including the full name of a private taxpayer involved in a dispute over customs and excise duties.
The Receiver called this a “grave error” and a “serious violation” of secrecy laws meant to protect private financial data.

According to the statement, the case referenced in the report dates back to 2016, when Customs issued an assessment of roughly 1.15 million guilders, which was later increased by a 300% penalty. The taxpayer filed objections in mid-2016, with hearings held in early 2017.

A final decision in the case was issued only on May 25, 2021—nearly four years later—after which a six-week appeal period began. In the meantime, standard procedure required the Receiver to suspend collection until the ruling became irrevocable.

Proactive Recovery Efforts

Despite the suspension, the Receiver said it worked “proactively” to secure partial payment through a temporary payment plan initiated in 2018, requiring a NAf 30,000 down payment and monthly installments of NAf 5,000 and NAf 3,000.

Later, Customs reduced the original assessment from NAf 4.6 million to about NAf 2.3 million. By 2021, the Receiver had collected NAf 180,000—before the Minister of Finance’s January 31, 2023, decision halted collection of all tax assessments dated 2017 and earlier.

The Receiver stressed that the decision to stop collections was not made by its office, but by the Ministry itself, emphasizing:

“It was not the Receiver who caused this loss of revenue. This should be clearly understood.”

Dispute Over Ministry Decision

The Receiver’s statement questions the Finance Ministry’s authority and reasoning in implementing the controversial policy, which effectively wrote off over 3.1 million guilders in potential tax revenue.

Of that total, around 2 million guilders relates directly to the same customs case referenced in the SOAB report.

“The question arises: on what basis and under what authority did the Minister make this decision and publish it on social media?” the Receiver asked. “The consequences are significant.”

According to the statement, the Finance Minister’s decision contradicted advice from several oversight institutions, including the CFT (Financial Supervision Board), SOAB, SVB, and the Directorate of Fiscal Affairs, as well as international recommendations by the OECD regarding tax enforcement practices.

Call for Responsible Oversight

The Receiver reaffirmed support for continued modernization and improvement of Curaçao’s Tax Service, but condemned the way the leaked SOAB audit was portrayed.

“Improving the Tax Service is certainly necessary, and nobody denies that,” the Receiver said. “But presenting the matter out of context, based on a leaked and incomplete report, damages public confidence and international credibility.”

The Receiver added that due to confidentiality obligations and an ongoing investigation, no further details could be disclosed at this time.

Context: Broader Transparency Debate

The dispute highlights a broader tension between calls for transparency and the legal duty of tax officials to maintain confidentiality.
Public trust in Curaçao’s fiscal institutions has been under scrutiny in recent years amid reforms to strengthen compliance, reduce deficits, and modernize the island’s revenue collection systems.

Observers say the leak, while exposing alleged inefficiencies, also risks undermining trust in the independence and professionalism of Curaçao’s tax authority.

Conclusion

In closing, the Receiver urged both government officials and the media to handle financial oversight information with care.

“Curaçao’s institutions can and must improve,” the statement read, “but improvement should come through lawful, transparent processes — not through leaks that violate confidentiality and harm the country’s image.”

Source: Official press release from Ontvanger di Kòrsou dated October 21, 2025, translated from Papiamentu.


From Paris to Philipsburg: A Tale of Two Justice Systems.

~As France jails ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy, Sint Maarten shows that in small democracies too, political power no longer guarantees immunity.~

scalesofjustice22102025When Nicolas Sarkozy walked through the gates of La Santé Prison in Paris this week, he became the first French president in the modern era to serve a custodial sentence. Convicted of criminal conspiracy for seeking illegal campaign funds from the late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, Sarkozy began a five-year term that he has called a “judicial scandal.”

For France, the image of a former head of state behind bars was shocking — a vivid reminder that no officeholder, however exalted, is beyond the reach of the courts.

But 7,000 kilometres away, on the island of Sint Maarten, scenes like this have become almost routine. There, former ministers and members of parliament have faced prosecution and imprisonment for corruption and campaign-finance crimes in recent years.

France: A President Behind Bars

Sarkozy, 70, was sentenced in September 2025 after a Paris criminal court found him guilty of organizing a secret funding network for his 2007 presidential campaign. The judge, Nathalie Gavarino, said the offences were of “exceptional gravity.”

He was acquitted of separate charges of misuse of Libyan public funds and illegal campaign financing, but the conspiracy conviction alone carried a five-year term.

Rather than appeal from home, Sarkozy was ordered to begin serving his sentence immediately — an extraordinary step under French law.

Inside La Santé, he occupies a small single cell with a shower, toilet, and television. His legal team has lodged an appeal and requested house arrest.

Public opinion is divided: a recent Elabe poll found 60 percent of French citizens believe the sentence is justified, while his supporters denounce what they call “judicial politics.”

Sint Maarten: When the Powerful Fall

If Sarkozy’s jailing rocked Paris, the people of Sint Maarten could be forgiven for greeting it with a shrug. In this Caribbean territory of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, high-level corruption trials have become a regular feature of political life.

Theo Heyliger — Former Minister and MP

Once regarded as the island’s most influential politician, Theodore (Theo) Heyliger was sentenced in May 2020 to five years in prison for bribery and money laundering in the Larimar case.
Prosecutors said Heyliger accepted millions in kickbacks tied to public-works contracts. He later agreed to a US$5 million settlement in asset-recovery proceedings and, after his appeals were exhausted, was ordered to report to Pointe Blanche Prison in January 2024 to begin his term.
The Office of the Public Prosecutor declared the case “closed and irrevocable.”

Frans Richardson — Former Member of Parliament

Another high-profile conviction came when Frans Richardson, leader of the United St. Maarten Party, was sentenced to 20 months’ imprisonment for bribery and money laundering in the Emerald Case..  While the outcome /Aquamarine II/Port case is still pending.
He began serving his sentence in March 2025 after the Dutch Supreme Court confirmed his conviction in the Emerald Case, while the Acquamarine case is finalized.

O’Neal Arrindell — Businessman and Political Financier

Businessman O’Neal Arrindell, a close associate of local politicians, was convicted in the Emerald Harbour fraud case for bribing a public official and tax offences.
Arrindell’s sentence — reported between three and five years — underlined how deeply campaign financing and public-contract fraud have intertwined on the island.

Different Scales, Similar Lessons

The contrast between Sarkozy’s cell in Paris and Heyliger’s in Philipsburg may seem vast, but the underlying principle is the same: the era of untouchable politicians is ending.

Legal scholar Dr. Lucinda James of the University of the Dutch Caribbean notes,

“France shows that even a president can go to prison. Sint Maarten shows that small democracies, once seen as lenient, can enforce accountability too.”

Both nations are part of complex political unions — France within the European Union and Sint Maarten within the Kingdom of the Netherlands — where judicial independence is enshrined in law. Yet in both, the public has often doubted whether powerful elites would ever truly face consequences.

Public Trust on the Line

For ordinary citizens, these convictions offer both vindication and discomfort.
In Paris, they confirm the resilience of institutions; in Philipsburg, they expose just how deep corruption had sunk into governance.

Local editorials have described a “culture shift” as Sint Maarten’s courts, backed by Dutch oversight, pursue high-level corruption cases once considered taboo.

A Pattern, Not an Exception

From Brazil’s Lula da Silva (who later returned to power) to South Korea’s Park Geun-hye and Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu (still on trial), the list of global leaders entangled in corruption cases keeps growing.
France has now decisively joined that list; Sint Maarten has been there for some time.

As one Philipsburg lawyer observed,

“On this island, seeing a politician go to prison isn’t shocking anymore. In Paris, it still is.”

Timeline: Justice Without Borders

Date

Event

2007

Sarkozy elected President of France.

May 2020

Theo Heyliger sentenced to five years for bribery and money-laundering.

Sept 2025

Sarkozy convicted of criminal conspiracy in Libya campaign-funding case.

Jan 2024

Heyliger ordered to report to Pointe Blanche Prison.

Mar 2025

Frans Richardson begins 20-month prison sentence.

Oct 21 2025

Sarkozy enters La Santé Prison in Paris.

Justice on Two Shores

The symbolism is powerful: in one week, two very different societies — one a global power, the other a Caribbean micro-state — both demonstrate that the rule of law can reach the highest offices.

For France, Sarkozy’s imprisonment redefines presidential accountability.
For Sint Maarten, Heyliger’s and Richardson’s convictions prove that even in a small island democracy, the cell door can close behind those who abuse public trust.

In both places, the message is the same: democracy only survives when its leaders can be judged — and jailed — like anyone else.

Sources: The Guardian, Reuters, AP News, Le Monde, Al Jazeera, The Daily Herald, SMN News, Office of the Public Prosecutor (OM Sint Maarten).

Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy Begins Historic Prison Term.

saercozy21102025PARIS, FRANCE:--- Inside a dramatic turn of events, Nicolas Sarkozy — who served as President of France from 2007 to 2012 — officially entered prison today to begin a five-year sentence after being convicted of criminal conspiracy linked to illicit campaign financing from Libya for his 2007 presidential campaign.

Key Facts at a Glance

  • On 25 September 2025, the Paris Criminal Court found Sarkozy guilty of criminal conspiracy (“association de malfaiteurs”) in a scheme to raise funds from the late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s regime to help finance the 2007 campaign.
  • He was given a five-year prison sentence, a fine of €100,000, and a five-year ban from holding public office.
  • Despite being convicted, Sarkozy immediately appealed. Under the court’s decision, he must nevertheless begin serving the sentence without waiting for the appeal to be completed—an exceptional measure cited as justified by the “exceptional gravity” of the case.
  • On 21 October 2025, at the age of 70, he became the first former French head of state in the post-war era to go to prison.
  • He entered La Santé Prison in Paris, reportedly to be held under solitary or special-protection conditions because of his high-profile status.

What Happened Today

This morning, Sarkozy departed his Paris residence hand-in-hand with his wife, Carla Bruni‑Sarkozy, while surrounded by supporters chanting his name and waving French flags.
He entered a police vehicle, which carried him to La Santé Prison, where he will serve his sentence. The decision to incarcerate him before his appeal concludes has provoked vigorous debate over legal precedent and political impact.

While en route, he released a message via social media asserting his innocence:

“It is not a former president of the Republic who is being imprisoned this morning — it is an innocent man,” he wrote.

Legal & Political Significance

The case marks a watershed moment in French politics and justice. According to observers:

  • The imposition of immediate incarceration for a former president underscores shifting attitudes toward accountability and white-collar crime in France.
  • Critics argue the decision to jail Sarkozy while his appeal is ongoing raises concerns about the presumption of innocence and equality before the law.
  • Sarkozy’s conviction comes amid multiple prior legal troubles, making this the most serious to date, given the actual prison term.

What’s Next

  • Sarkozy’s legal team has requested early release pending appeal; under French la,w the appeals court has up to two months to decide.
  • His incarceration is expected to tilt the political landscape: although he is no longer running for office, his influence within conservative circles remains significant.
  • Public reaction is mixed–while many see the verdict as a symbol of justice, his supporters view it as political persecution.

Behind the Conviction

The prosecution’s core claim was that between 2005 and 2007, Sarkozy and his allies negotiated an illicit funding pact with Gaddafi’s regime in exchange for diplomatic and business favours. While the court did not establish with certainty that all the funds were used in the campaign, it found the “association” and act of scheming criminal under French law.

Human & Symbolic Dimensions

Few former presidents in the Western democratic world have faced prison. Reporting notes like:

  • Supporters outside his home displayed banners reading “Courage Nicolas, return soon” and sang the French national anthem as he left.
  • He is reported to have taken books with him, including Alexandre Dumas’ The Count of Monte Cristo, symbolising his sense of conviction and the dramatic nature of his fall from power.

For the Evening Edition

Today’s incarceration of Nicolas Sarkozy isn’t merely a legal milestone—it is a moment of symbolic rupture. A man who once stood at the summit of French politics is now subject to the same bars and cells he once governed. With his appeal yet to be heard, and remaining public influence intact, France now watches how his absence, behind walls, will echo through the corridors of power.

NV GEBE Partners with Government of Sint Maarten to Launch Utility Relief Pilot Program for Vulnerable Community Members.

brugroggendorf21102025PHILIPSBURG:--- N.V. Gemeenschappelijk Electriciteitsbedrijf Bovenwindse Eilanden (NV GEBE) and the Government of Sint Maarten, through the Ministry of Public Health, Social Development, and Labor's, Division of Labor Affairs and Social Services (DLASS), announced today the launch of a groundbreaking one-year pilot program to provide utility bill relief for vulnerable members of the community.

Program Overview

The pilot program will provide up to XCG 50,000 in monthly relief to eligible financial aid recipients and community members, helping to ease the financial burden of utility costs for those most in need. Through this collaborative initiative, qualifying individuals can receive up to XCG 250 per month in utility bill deductions. "This partnership represents our commitment to supporting the most vulnerable members of our community," said Mr. Thomas Roggendorf, Transition Manager of NV GEBE. "By working together with the Government and Social Services, we can make a meaningful difference in people's lives during challenging economic times."

How the Program Works

The relief will be administered through a voucher system, with each voucher valued at XCG 50. Eligible members can receive up to five vouchers per month, providing a maximum monthly relief of XCG 250 on their utility bills. Social Services will determine eligibility based on their registry of vulnerable community members and will conduct reassessments every two months to ensure the program reaches those who need it most. The program allocates: • XCG 25,000 monthly for existing registered financial aid community members • XCG 25,000 monthly for new eligible members within the community who apply through Social Services.

Eligibility Requirements

To qualify for the program, individuals must: • Be a private person (not a legal entity) • Have utility bills in their own name as an existing NV GEBE customer.

*  Be registered with Social Services as a vulnerable member of the community or be approved as a new eligible member after assessment

• Meet the requirements – as set forth in the National Ordinance on Financial Aid.

Minister of Public Health, Social Development & Labor, Mr. Richinel Brug, emphasized the importance of this initiative: "This pilot program demonstrates our government's dedication to social services and ensuring that our most vulnerable citizens have access to essential services. We are grateful to NV GEBE for their partnership in this vital community support effort. I want to thank Drs. Dros-Richardson and the entire staff of Social Services for their dedication to seeing this pilot program through.

Application Process:

Community members interested in the program should contact Social Services to determine their eligibility. Social Services will handle all assessments and provide qualified individuals with vouchers that can be redeemed at NV GEBE's office when making utility bill payments. Mrs. Peggy-Ann Dros-Richardson, Division Head of Labor Affairs & Social Services, added: "We encourage anyone facing financial hardship with their utility costs to reach out to Social Services. Our team is ready to assess applications and provide support to those who qualify for this important relief program."

Program Duration:

The pilot program will run for one year from the date of implementation, with the implementation date set to be December 1, 2025, with the possibility of extension based on the program's success and continued collaboration between the parties. The public is strongly encouraged to listen out for radio interviews, FAQ sheets, and more critical information to be shared in the coming weeks – ahead of December 1, 2025.

Committee of Kingdom Affairs and Inter-Parliamentary Relations (CKAIR) to meet for debriefing of IPKO and Tripartite September 25-29, 2025.

PHILIPSBURG:---The Permanent Committee of Kingdom Affairs and Inter-Parliamentary Relations (CKAIR) of Parliament will meet on October 22, 2025.

The Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday at 14:00 hrs. in the Legislative Hall at Wilhelminastraat #1 in Philipsburg.

The agenda points are:

1. Incoming documents 

2. Debriefing IPKO and Tripartite September 25-29, 2025

Members of the public are invited to the House of Parliament to attend parliamentary deliberations.

All persons visiting the House of Parliament must adhere to the house rules.

The House of Parliament is located across from the Court House in Philipsburg. 

The parliamentary sessions will be carried live on TV 15, Soualiga Headlines, via SXM GOV radio FM 107.9, via Pearl Radio FM 98.1, the audio via the internet www.youtube.com/c/SintMaartenParliament and www.pearlfmradio.sx  

More Articles ...


Subcategories